(![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
catscradle Oct. 11th, 2002 01:52 pm)
catscradle Oct. 11th, 2002 01:52 pm)Well, it's a sad sad day for democracy and the constitution. The House and Senate gave power to the President to go to war. Why? I don't know. I guess it looks good on paper. I thought giving the war powers to the Congress was a good thing in checks and balances - but I guess they just don't want the responsibility anymore.
From the CNN Article: Senate approves Iraq war resolution
The language here seems to give Bush free reign to do whatever the hell he wants.
I'd like to thank Sen Byrd for at least trying to voice opposition. He was furious on the Senate floor and I think he spoke for a lot of us:
I'd also like to give my thanks to the six Republican congressmen who voted for their conscience and against their party in the House vote. I saw Ron Paul, (R) Texas, on Chris Matthews last night and I was rather impressed with what he had to say regarding this issue and the legality of the resolution. We may have lost, but at least we had a voice.
There are many saying that if the vote was made private many of the people voting for the resolution would have voted against - if it's true than our represetatives are cowards and they need fired. I know the Colorado senators received calls from the people on the issue - 80 against to every one for. And they STILL voted for Bush's resolution. This information was gathered from the secretary of Senator Allard's office.
Not quite a Government of the people, for the people, by the people anymore, is it?
From the CNN Article: Senate approves Iraq war resolution
The resolution requires Bush to declare to Congress either before or within 48 hours after beginning military action that diplomatic efforts to enforce the U.N. resolutions have failed.
Bush also must certify that action against Iraq would not hinder efforts to pursue the al Qaeda terrorist network that attacked New York and Washington last year. And it requires the administration to report to Congress on the progress of any war with Iraq every 60 days.
The language here seems to give Bush free reign to do whatever the hell he wants.
I'd like to thank Sen Byrd for at least trying to voice opposition. He was furious on the Senate floor and I think he spoke for a lot of us:
"This is the Tonkin Gulf resolution all over again," Byrd said. "Let us stop, look and listen. Let us not give this president or any president unchecked power. Remember the Constitution."
I'd also like to give my thanks to the six Republican congressmen who voted for their conscience and against their party in the House vote. I saw Ron Paul, (R) Texas, on Chris Matthews last night and I was rather impressed with what he had to say regarding this issue and the legality of the resolution. We may have lost, but at least we had a voice.
There are many saying that if the vote was made private many of the people voting for the resolution would have voted against - if it's true than our represetatives are cowards and they need fired. I know the Colorado senators received calls from the people on the issue - 80 against to every one for. And they STILL voted for Bush's resolution. This information was gathered from the secretary of Senator Allard's office.
Not quite a Government of the people, for the people, by the people anymore, is it?
